Definition: [And] Zechariah the son of Meshelemiah [was] porter of the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Chronicles 9:21. It's a really important and slightly mysterious part of the story of the Tabernacle in Israel. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: Basically, Zechariah was responsible for keeping the door open to the tabernacle. Let’s unpack that a little further: 1 Chronicles 9: This is a chapter in the Old Testament Bible that tells us about the Tabernacle – a huge, portable temple built by God for his people. 9:21: This verse describes who was responsible for keeping the door open. It says "And Zechariah the son of Meshelemiah." Now, let’s look at who was Meshelemiah? Meshelemiah was a very important and trusted man in the royal household. He was a treasurer – someone who managed money and resources for the king and his court. He held a very significant position of responsibility. So, what does this all mean practically? It suggests that Zechariah was a vital part of the Tabernacle’s security and organization. He was essentially a gatekeeper, ensuring that people – including the King himself – could enter and exit the sacred space without being disturbed or causing problems. Why is this significant? This detail highlights several important ideas: Order and Responsibility: It shows that the Tabernacle wasn’t just a building; it was a carefully organized place with clear roles and responsibilities. Trust and Loyalty: Zechariah's position emphasizes the importance of trust and loyalty within the royal court. He was entrusted with protecting something incredibly sacred. In short, this verse tells us that Zechariah played a crucial role in maintaining security and order within the Tabernacle, making him a vital part of its operation. --- Do you want to delve deeper into any specific aspect of this verse? For example: Would you like me to explain the historical context surrounding the Tabernacle? Are you curious about why this detail is considered significant in biblical interpretation?